Shared by Jardenberg
Jaaaa! Jeff Jarvis vänder på AP frågan och säger att bloggarna borde få betalt för att länka till AP istället. Ja, ungefär som jag resonerar med google. Vi hade ALDRIG haft råd att köpa den trafiken som google kastar på oss alldeles gratis. De är våra bästa vänner (men givetvis också en ulv i fårakläder jag är inte naiv…). Länkar är den nya valutan. Så se till att bli länkad…
In media, we are moving from a content economy to a link economy.
The AP Affair is the best illustration of the clash between these two worldviews.
Let’s turn the discussion on its head. Let’s say that the real value in this equation is not content and information — both of which are now quickly commodified — but links, which are the new currency of media. Links can be exploited and monetized; get links and you can grab audience and show ads and make money. Content is becoming a cost burden, what you have to have to get the links, but in and of itself, content can’t draw value without an audience, without links.
So now let’s turn this fight on its head. The AP should not be asking for payment for its content. The bloggers should be asking for payment for their links. That is where the value is in this economy.
Step away from that ‘comment’ link. I am not seriously suggesting that bloggers should demand or accept payment for links. Indeed, that would be quite unethical — very PayPerPosty: selling out and devaluing our credibility. That’s why we don’t do it. Our link ethic would not allow it.
Still, there is value in our links and the AP, if it understood this new economy would understand that it is a gift economy and links are presents that can be given or earned but not bought. But the AP is still operating in the content economy, which values control instead. That age has passed.
